New Work by Robert Dale Anderson and Sydney Yeager

DBERMAN GALLERY
AUSTIN

by Rebecca Cohen   
ARTL!ES
Summer 2002

A review...

 
 

Sydney Yeager and Robert Dale Anderson claimed to be nervous before speaking to the Saturday afternoon crowd gathered at d berman gallery in Austin.  I guess expounding on your own recent production in front of other artists, potential collectors and old friends must be more intimidating than facing undergraduates. (Anderson teaches at the University of Texas in Austin and Yeager at Austin Community College and the Art School at Laguna Gloria.) But really, they should have been at ease.  Theirs was one of the best exhibitions to date at the Austin gallery, no small feat, given the overall quality of the work shown by Berman.  In fact the dialogue that occurred between Anderson's small graphite drawings and Yeager's large, intensely colored canvases set such a high standard that the artists' real challenge was competing with their own work for the attention of the audience.

Yeager began by talking about birds in motion against the sky.  The artist's eye is engaged from the moment she leaves her home in Austin and throughout the drive to her Elgin studio 30 minutes away.  She described dark specks against a brilliant blue background, flying in formation, being blown about by the wind and then regrouping, and she recalled seeing fish swimming together in tight formation in a stream, scattering and returning to form the same larger shape.  Her words evoked the tension between chaos and order in nature.  In light of the squiggles and amoebic forms that sometimes cover her canvases, this fascination with the way small living things--or small strokes--combine to form a cohesive whole makes perfect sense.  Next Yeager read excerpts from a favorite book, Mr. Palomar, waxing philosophical, bypassing talk about process and pictorial sources and moving into some heavy-duty abstract thinking.

David Berman brought her back to basics with a leading question about how she applies oil paint to canvas. Yeager said she begins each painting without a specific plan and works toward recognition that it is complete.  Each layer challenges the last, disrupting the initial pattern and replacing it with another that may be similar or disarmingly different.  She showed snapshots of a painting in progress so we could see her process; understand the scattering and realignment of her thoughts on canvas.  Each photo appeared to show an entirely different painting. 

While the way she works has remained essentially the same, these new paintings look quite different from earlier ones that usually included body parts, vessels and repetitive symbols meant to approximate a kind of private language.  The new works are abstract, devoid of the iconography and calligraphic strokes that used to move the eye around the canvas.  Now she indicates, "you are here" and "proceed this way" with dabs of color or ever-so-subtle vertical lines.  What might previously have been a small bird or drawing of a hand has been replaced by a smattering of red, a smear of yellow.  A quick glance at the wall misleads viewers that there is a yellow painting, a red one, a blue, but a close look reveals that each canvas contains a wild blend of colors.  Asked to comment on these changes, Yeager reminded one audience member of a question he had asked her years before--Do you put the images in your older paintings for you or for us?  She answered that those images had been for her.  But now she doesn't need them any more. 

I have watched Yeager's work for a long time (I represented her through R.S. Levy Gallery in Austin in the 80s) and so I must admit to feelings of near maternal pride when I see how post graduate school weaknesses--a thin, less painterly surface on large works, a self-conscious vocabulary--have been addressed.  The painter now displays an easeful commitment to building and crafting each surface.  Each canvas is stubbornly worked until it achieves its full potential.  Yeager's painting career (begun late when her children were already half grown) has evolved in a similarly deliberate manner.  The Galveston Art Center is planning a well-deserved Yeager retrospective in 2003.

While Yeager claimed she was nervous, she spoke and fielded questions with ease.  However, Bob Anderson's pale visage and jittery voice confirmed that his presentation was indeed something of a personal ordeal.  His work, on the other hand, is supremely confident.  From a distance, the complex pencil drawings echo Yeager's paintings, appearing at first as black and white abstract miniatures versions of Yeager's dense surfaces.  But when viewers approach as if myopically straining to make sense of a world that is not quite in focus, the drawings reveal a jumbled mix of odd characters, chaotic interiors, deserted tables, cobwebs, and candles.  The artist manipulates shadow and light to create the illusion of space.  Peering into those shadows, one feels vaguely like a child unable to sleep, worrying about what might be hiding under the bed or off in a dark corner.  Anderson creates cavelike and gloomy settings where his personal mythology plays out.  His newer drawings include windows and doorways welcoming a new light into the dank interiors, but even these locals are not exactly bathed in sunlight and happy thoughts. There are simply fewer midnight moments and more early twilights. 

Anderson attributes this new light to the fact that he has moved from a dark apartment where he lived for years to a well-lighted space.  Perhaps the drawings do reflect this change.  He still watches black and white TV, however, dreams in black and white, and enjoys sitting in the dark.  He also continues to look at paintings by an assortment of famously individualistic artists including Giovanni Batista Piranese, James , James Ensor, Jan Steen, Jan Brueghel and Odilon Redon making reference to their compositions on occasion while creating his own original and bizarre works. The drawings are small--the largest in this exhibit measures 7 x 15 inches--but so filled with detail and ambiguity that each one rewards the viewer's time and attention. 

Anderson's process is like Yeager's.  He makes elegant marks, eliminates some, reworks others, embellishes and layers.  He begins without a plan.  Yet despite the labored process each drawing retains a freshness and spontaneity that is daunting--if you've ever wrestled with a hard lead pencil.  At just the right moment he recognizes that the work is finished (or else he says he stuffs it in a drawer and moves along to the next one).  "Drawing is a way to make the invisible visible," says Anderson.  "I don't know what I want until I find it.”  The artist also says his work is about gesture and culture, death, chaos, time-passing and not passing.  And there is always that nod to art history: his titles--for instance, Separation Anxiety which depicts St. Barbara being beheaded by her father--are droll and not to be missed either.  Despite his initial reticence in the gallery, Anderson does have a way with words.

I hastily took notes while he and Yeager spoke, and later found that I had scrawled, “united in cosmic chaos" at the bottom of my notepad.  I have no recollection where those words came from, but as I think back on the exhibition, both Anderson and Yeager do individualistic artists including Giovanni appear to be worrying thousands of chaotic Batista Piranese, James Ensor, Jan Steen, Jan brush and pencil strokes until they reveal comBrueghel and Odilon Redon making reference positions that delight and challenge.  If imposto their compositions on occasion while creating order on chaos is the job of the artist, ing his own original and bizarre works.  The these two do it particularly well. drawings are small-the largest in this exhibit measures 7 x 15 inches-but so filled with detail and ambiguity that each one rewards the viewer's time and attention.  Anderson's process is like Yeager's.  He makes elegant marks, eliminates some, reworks others, embellishes and layers.  He begins without a plan.  Yet despite the labored process each drawing retains a freshness and spontaneity that is daunting-if you've ever wrestled with a hard lead pencil.  At just the right moment he recognizes that the work is finished (or else he says he stuffs it in a drawer and moves along to the next one).  "Drawing is a way to make the invisible visible," says Anderson.  "I don't know what I want until I find it." The artist also says his work is about gesture and culture, death, chaos, timepassing and not passing.  And there is always that nod to art history: his titles-for instance, Separation Anxiety which depicts St. Barbara being beheaded by her father-are droll and not to be missed either.  Despite his initial reticence in the gallery, Anderson does have a way with words.

I hastily took notes while he and Yeager spoke, and later found that I had scrawled, "united in cosmic chaos" at the bottom of my notepad.  I have no recollection where those words came from, but as I think back on the exhibition, both Anderson and Yeager do appear to be worrying thousands of chaotic brush and pencil strokes until they reveal compositions that delight and challenge.  If imposing order on chaos is the job of the artist, these two do it particularly well.

Back to previous page.

 
     
 

home  |  about  |  past  |  current  |  coming  |  artists

 

  DBERMAN GALLERY
CONTEMPORARY FINE ART
1701 GUADALUPE STREET 
AUSTIN TEXAS  78701
512
.477.8877

Email us!
email us:
david@dbermangallery.com

       

 

© 2000  www.dbermangallery.com
digiMuse web design